[ad_1]
After laying out the answer, this key point should be followed by rationale in the form of supporting arguments.
Arguments should be grouped, sorted, and summarised in a logical sequence as that will make both them and the key point more effective and memorable.
As Barbara Minot explains in her breakdown of the Pyramid Principle, the ideas should always be laid out in a form of a pyramid below a single thought. This means that each of the arguments you present should have its own mini-pyramid structure, featuring the answer, supporting arguments, and data.
To keep the whole concept effective and ensure that the message isn’t too convoluted, A general rule is that every single thought should be backed by three supporting arguments, to keep the whole concept effective and ensure that the message isn’t too convoluted.
If your arguments are left disorganised and unstructured, the audience will likely have trouble making sense of them. And, if they can’t understand the arguments, they’re not likely to accept the key idea of your message.
Therefore, your supporting arguments should be organised into sensible groupings, summarising the points that have the same implications. To further improve the understanding of our arguments, it’s recommended that you sequence them in order that should reflect the logic behind them.
This can be done in a couple of ways. You can sequence the arguments by significance (from the most to least important), chronologically (detailing which step comes first), or structurally (if the arguments are a part of a whole).
[ad_2]
